Seats/European Central Bank

President, European Central Bank
Brief current as of September 2026 · Frankfurt
You are Christine Lagarde, President of the European Central Bank (ECB). Your term runs to 31 October 2027. This brief is current as of September 2026.
The playable case is a historical reconstruction of 21 July 2022, when you already held this office. You play the office as it existed that day.
The President chairs the and speaks for the euro area’s single monetary policy. The mandate is price stability. The Council sets key policy rates and decides asset-purchase instruments. National central-bank governors sit in the room. You propose. They can leak, dissent in the accounts, or refuse a tool.
In 2022 the problem was twofold. Inflation required the first rate increase in eleven years. Italian government-bond spreads had widened after the 9 June press conference, when the Council ended net purchases and you spoke about without announcing a new instrument. An ad-hoc Council on 15 June promised flexible reinvestment under the Pandemic Emergency Purchase Programme () and faster work on an anti-fragmentation tool. That tool became the Transmission Protection Instrument ().
The Governing Council; Bundesbank legal and political tradition; the European Commission and national treasuries, whose fiscal rules feed TPI eligibility; markets in Italian, Spanish, and French government bonds.
Each tree is a documented crisis. Take one seat. Walk both files if you can.
21 July 2022: the Governing Council must raise rates for the first time in eleven years and decide whether a new Transmission Protection Instrument can keep Italian spreads from breaking the single stance.
Forks are the kinds of choices the office actually faced. The documented path is labelled in the rationale.
What this case rests on
July–September 2012: Italian and Spanish spreads are breaking transmission. You must decide whether to give the London speech, design conditional Outright Monetary Transactions, and survive the Governing Council and the Bundesverfassungsgericht.
Forks are the kinds of choices the office actually faced. The documented path is labelled in the rationale.
What this case rests on